Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Popejoy v. Edwards et al
as 6:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Laurel County Sheriff's Dept., Det. Bryan Lawson, Sgt. Chris Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Shelby County
as 2:2020cv02434
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Shelby County, Ofc. Baggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Strickland-Saffold et al
as 1:2020cv01330
Defendant:
Atty. Justin Weatherly, Ofc. John Doe 5, Ofc. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Maiya McCoy and Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv02438
Defendant:
Ofc. Johnson, Ofc. Dance, Sgt. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Shelby County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2020cv02389
Plaintiff:
John L. Nash
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff and Shelby County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomson v. Maury County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Maury County Sheriff Dept., Maury County Jail and David Stewart
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ray Thomson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Guy et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Tim Carver, Sheriff Joe Guy and McMinn County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Muskingum County Commissioners et al
as 2:2020cv01642
Defendant:
Deputy Michael Lynn, K-9 Deputy Narco, Deputy Ryan Dodson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriffs Dept
as 2:2020cv02066
Petitioner:
Nathan D. Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriffs Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
as 2:2020cv02030
Petitioner:
Nathan Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
