Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Roy Jones, Jr. v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 09-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROY D. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, Director, in her individual capacity, DARLENE EDLUND, Then Deputy Warden, in her individual and official capacity, GREG MCQUIGGIN, Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: SUSAN BURKE, Hearing Officer, in her individual capacity, BARRY MCLEMORE, Warden, Deputy Director, in his individual and official capacity, TIMOTHY LUOMA, Then Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Jones v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv01622
Petitioner: Michael D Jones
Respondent: Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. CCA et al
as 3:2008cv00765
Petitioner: Derrick Jermaine Jordan
Respondent: CCA, T. Pierce, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones #235548 v. Caruso et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff: Roy D. Jones #235548, Jr.
Defendant: Patricia Caruso, Susan Burke, Barry McLemore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00567
Plaintiff: Antonio D. Jones
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Motley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2007cv00111
Plaintiff: Frederick D. Jones
Defendant: John Motley and John Rees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Motley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00634
Plaintiff: Frederick D. Jones
Defendant: John Motley and John Rees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?