Cases 31 - 40 of 2,330
Jones v. FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES and KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Macauley
as 1:2024cv10734
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
People and Matt Macauley
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv10683
Plaintiff:
Jumaane Jones and Jumaane Amunra Jones
Defendant:
Campbell, Krueger, Rombach and others
Fields v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Benny C. Fields
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Brandon Watwood, Lt. Suanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones #617568 v. MTU Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility and Unknown Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones #529086 v. Juarez et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
James Jones #529086 and PREA Victim
Defendant:
Unknown Juarez, Nathan Brooke, Riccardo Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Nevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Ingham County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Ingham County Correctional Facility and Justin Hagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #617568 v. Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
MTU Correctional Facility, Unknown Amsley and Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
