Cases 31 - 40 of 398
Lambert v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Lambert
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Dr. Elaina Rodela, CoreCivic/South Central Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Mitchell
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Carvajal, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kliessendorff et al v. Nelson County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Kliessendorff, M.A.K., A.R.K. and others
Defendant:
Nelson County Jail, Nelson County Sherriff's, Nelson County Taskforce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv00422
Petitioner:
Robert Dean Mitchell
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGee v. Gay et al
as 3:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Bruce Henley, Mike Anderson, Thomas Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Stevonte' Dion McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Greene County Detention Center
as 2:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Donald Dewayne Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leis v. Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Officer Casey Stanton, Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Leis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leis v. Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Officer Casey Stanton, Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearm Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Leis, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. USA
as 6:2021cv00035
Petitioner:
Jason Dean Borden
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams #225280 v. Carlson et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, Michael R. Dean, Dana Nessel and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
