Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Jonathan Riches v. John Wooden, et al
as 10-5896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBERT WOODEN, aka John Wooden, DENNY CRUM and BILL WALTON
Riches v. Wooden et al
as 4:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
John Robert Wooden, Denny Crum and Bill Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Demos, Jr. v. MDOC
as 10-1738
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Franklin v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01108
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin
Defendant:
Joseph G. Easterling, Barbara Buford and Kennith Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00955
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr. and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demos v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, President of the United States of America, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. MDOC
as 10-1264
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Demos v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv00985
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Washington, The United States of America, The District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawls #211542 v. Wickstrom et al
as 2:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
John Robert Rawls #211542
Defendant:
Unknown Wickstrom, Unknown Ekdahl, Unknown Gransinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
