Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Mustafa-Ali v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2016cv02489
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Mustafa-Ali
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Correct Care Solution, Nona Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvin Roberts v. John Doe, et al
as 16-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Livingston County District/Circuit Court Judges, Livingston County Jail, Livingston County Sheriff's Department, etc., JANE DOE, Livingston County District/Circuit Court Judges, Livingston County Jail, Livingston County Sheriff's Department, etc., MARK A. GATESMAN, Trial Attorney and others
Ronald Irwin v. John Doe, et al
as 16-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD IRWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, Cheyboygan County Prosecutor's Office and Sheriff's Department, Cheyboygan County District Court/Circuit Court Judges, Warren Police Department, etc., NICHOLAS V. HILE and others
Nuriddin v. USA
as 1:2016cv00209
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Muhammad J Nuriddin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. USA
as 2:2016cv00076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad #242898 v. Jackson
as 1:2016cv00449
Petitioner:
El Amin Muhammad #242898
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul-Rahman v. USA
as 7:2016cv00040
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Muhammad Abdul-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad #242898 v. Neher et al
as 1:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
El Amin Muhammad #242898
Defendant:
Kyle A. Neher, Unknown Party #1, Norton Shores Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irwin v. Doe et al
as 2:2015cv14471
Plaintiff:
Ronald Irwin
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Nicholas V. Hile and others
Roberts v. Doe et al
as 2:2015cv14464
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roberts
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Mark A. Gatesman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
