Cases 541 - 550 of 100,327
Gilchrease v. Dickerson
as 2:2024cv02320
Petitioner:
Victericka Gilchrease
Respondent:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Landfair et al
as 2:2024cv11243
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Reyes
Defendant:
Sirena Landfair, Alinda Florek, Charles Jamsen and others
Lucas v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Derek Lucas and Derek Lashun Lucas
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Warden at Federal Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowling
Defendant:
Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell County 17th District Court
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nugget Williams
Defendant:
Campbell County 17th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toddell Alexander v. USA
as 24-3408
Petitioner:
TODDELL ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grasty v. Pounds
as 3:2024cv00587
Petitioner:
Quinzell Grasty
Respondent:
Zack Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. Philpot et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Lydia Shepherd
Defendant:
Tabitha Philpot and Sabrina Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, C. Taylor and Jessica Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
