Cases 541 - 550 of 100,315
Bonds v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
Brandon Bonds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Benson v. Memphis Police Department and Subordinates
as 2:2024cv02358
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department and Subordinates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook #767925 v. Morrison
as 1:2024cv00535
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Charles Judson Holbrook #767925
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Vital Core Health Strategies et al
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Walker
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies, Glenn Groom, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witham #732101 v. Piggott et al
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Charles Witham #732101
Defendant:
Unknown Piggott, Unknown Bennickson and Katherine West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiff v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv11302
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Stiff
Defendant:
Ross, Greason, Dobb and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ketchens v. Rewerts
as 2:2024cv11388
Petitioner:
Leonard Michael Ketchens
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Paulk v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Monquel Dejuan-Lee Paulk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
