Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Ronald Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 13-5911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and JEFFREY A. HEDDEN
Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 2:2013cv02494
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Davis
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and John Doe U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bernadel v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02410
Plaintiff:
Mario Gerard Bernadel
Defendant:
D.R. Stephens, FCI - Memphis, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Davis
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Jeffrey A. Hedden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Adams v. Ballard et al
as 5:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard, Fayette County Detention Center, Gary Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Jones, Sheriff et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Landon M. Price
Defendant:
Richard K. Jones, Sheriff, Bunnel, Lt and Unknown U.S. Marshal, Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Williams v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 2:2011cv02895
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pierre Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal, Correction Corporation of America and West Tennessee Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 2:2011cv02086
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Correction Corporation of America and Illaraza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sergio Navarro v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-3658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGIO NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
