Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 812
Teague v. County of Mahoning et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01856
Plaintiff: Justin Teague
Defendant: County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Commissioners, Captain Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Brockway et al
as 2:2023cv12321
Plaintiff: Tyler Green
Defendant: Marcy Brockway, Porter and Amanda Peeks
Snell v. Green
as 2:2023cv00121
Petitioner: Curtis Snell
Respondent: James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall Price v. James Green
as 23-5749
Petitioner / Appellant: RANDALL E. PRICE
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden
Green v. Eller
as 1:2023cv01170
Petitioner: Donte Green
Respondent: Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dooley v. Knox County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff: Jerome Nchiyaleo Dooley and Jerome Nchiyako Dooley
Defendant: Knox County, Scott G Greene, Hector Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Monroe
as 4:2023cv01405
Plaintiff: Corey Corneil Green
Defendant: Chief Sheriff Paul Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff: Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant: David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Green
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner: John Mills
Respondent: James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Boyce et al
as 0:2023cv00075
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Todd Boyce, Head Chaplin Todd Boyce, James David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?