Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Reyes v. Landfair et al
as 2:2024cv11243
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Reyes
Defendant:
Sirena Landfair, Alinda Florek, Charles Jamsen and others
Plaster #846864 et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Robert Plaster #846864 and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Patricia Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila-Salazar v. Perry, Warden
as 3:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Alejandro Avila-Salazar
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salazar v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
Sue Ann Salazar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Salazar v. Johns et al
as 1:2020cv01136
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General and T. Johns
Petitioner:
Guillermo Alfonso Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salazar v. Shelby County Jail Memphis TN 38103 et al
as 2:2019cv02320
Plaintiff:
Carlos Salazar, Jr. and Pedro Sedillo
Defendant:
All Ranking Officers and 3rd Floor Available Officers, Mr. Johnson and Shelby County Jail Memphis TN 38103
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spalding v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2018cv00819
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Doug R. Sharp, Melissa Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Kindi Spalding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Scarsborough et al
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Drew Scarsborough, Frank DeClair, Doug LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salazar v. Pugh
as 4:2012cv00917
Plaintiff:
Cirilo Cruz Salazar
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Correction Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Salazar et al
as 2:2012cv10526
Plaintiff:
Keith Maddox
Defendant:
David Salazar, Todd Eby, Michael Carson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
