Cases 1 - 10 of 421
Stephens v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Barry Stephens
Defendant:
Lt. Pitts, B. Chamber, Lt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigue v. Fugate et al
as 6:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tigue
Defendant:
Lisa L. Fugate, Karen Blondell, Don Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
DeAndrey Peterson
Defendant:
Steven Wright, Hannah Evans, J Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Parr-Mirza et al
as 2:2024cv10595
Plaintiff:
Arnold V Henry
Defendant:
Parr-Mirza, B. Schaschko, Angela Joseph and others
McLemore v. Saffold et al.
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gregory McLemore
Defendant:
Atty. Jeffrey R. Saffold, Atty. Joseph V. Pagano and Dr. John Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyle Heyward v. Veronica Dinkins, et al
as 24-3036
Plaintiff:
LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant:
VERONICA DINKINS, KASEY PLANK, R. BAUER and others
Taper v. Branch et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jennifer Branch, Sydney Greathouse, Pavan V. Parikh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
