Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,006
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff: RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Defendant: Julie Lynch, FREDERICK D. BENTON, CORY D. HELFFRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. McCustion et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant: Lt Slade McCustion, Jailer Ken Claud, Major Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner: Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent: Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams #187169 v. Davids
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Adams #187169
Defendant: John Davids
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11273
Petitioner: Christopher Sanchez, Sr.
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor: Kendra Feltner
Defendant: Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner: Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Hare v. Adam Douglas
as 24-1271
Petitioner: TIMOTHY HARE
Respondent: ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant: Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?