Cases 1 - 10 of 448
Robert Young v. Sarah Schroeder, et al
as 24-1531
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL YOUNG
Defendant:
SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden, in official and personal capacity, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as C/O Doe, Marquette Transfer Officer; in official and personal capacity and UNKNOWN PARTY #2, named as C/O Super. Transfer Marquette Branch prison; in official and personal capacity
Clayton, III v. Woosley
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Earl Clayton, III
Respondent:
Jason Woosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ronnie McDonald v. Detroit, MI Police Department
as 24-1402
Plaintiff:
RONNIE EARL MCDONALD
Defendant:
DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, 8th Precinct
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Neal
Respondent:
Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Patterson v. Bryan Morrison
as 24-1165
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EARL PATTERSON
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden, Lakeland Correctional Facility
Young #194860 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Young #194860
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
