Cases 1 - 10 of 1,685
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boles #156632 v. Sisco et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant:
Savannah P. Sisco, Kevin S. Dirschell and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Kevin Small and Arthur Greentree
Not Yet Classified:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole Detainer/Warrant #4383V
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin Cassaday v. USA
as 24-1485
Petitioner:
KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and CHRISTOPHER SZCZYGIEL, F.B.I. Special Agent
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vayko v. Oakland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv11327
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vayko
Defendant:
Oakland County Sheriff's Department, Daniel Kruse, Michael Warren and others
Waters v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Reginol Leon Waters
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Frank Strata, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
