Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Christopher Smith v. David Dawdy, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DAWDY, Corrections Mental Health Program Director, official and personal capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, official capacity, GREG JOHNSON, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment, personal capacity and others
Smith #233282 v. Dawdy et al
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith #233282
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Heidi Washington, Greg Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Muskegon County 60th District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Torrance Leon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County 60th District Court, Muskegon County Circuit Court, Michael J. Poulin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Ray
as 4:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
Davontae McCall
Respondent:
Warden H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Canady v. Sgt. McCall et al
as 2:2020cv01415
Defendant:
Carole Crocket Harris and Sgt. McCall et al
Plaintiff:
Larry Canady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Bowerman et al
as 3:2019cv01737
Defendant:
Mr. Sizemore, Warden Sean Bowerman, Ms. Phillps and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston et al v. Bowerman et al
as 3:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Mr. Wilson, Mr. Gyescy, Ms. Wyrek and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie McCall and Rico Isaih Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Bradley
as 1:2018cv02835
Respondent:
Warden Charles Bradley
Petitioner:
Tony McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 2:2018cv02478
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. USA
as 2:2018cv00098
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronnie Lee McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
