Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Mitchell v. Strata et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Raymon A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Brandon Watwood, Robert J. Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Shaw et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Franklin Fitch
Defendant:
Cynthia Shaw, Officer Aimes, Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guadalupe Ramos v. USA
as 23-5272
Petitioner / Appellant:
GUADALUPE RAMOS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Abel Villagrana v. Kimisha Loving, et al
as 22-6084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABEL ALEJANDRO VILLAGRANA
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMISHA LOVING, Sergeant, SERGEANT MADU, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARTER and others
Ramos v. USA
as 5:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Ramos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramos v. Garza
as 4:2022cv01873
Petitioner:
Julio A Ramos
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos-Andino v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Lornie Ariel Ramos-Andino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villagrana v. Loving et al
as 3:2021cv00836
Plaintiff:
Abel Alejandro Villagrana
Defendant:
Kimisha Loving, Mr. (f/n/u) Madu, Mr. (f/n/u) Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Ramos et al v. Emerson et al
as 1:2020cv00548
Plaintiff:
Sergio Portocarrero-Reina, Eddy Leonel Chacon-Cruz, Samuel Enrique Perez-Charcas and others
Defendant:
J. Stakenas and Donald Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinonez Velez et al v. Emerson
as 1:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Porras Quintero, Moises Gamboa, Jorge Ramos and others
Defendant:
Donald Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
