Cases 1 - 10 of 107
New York State Correctional v. McCray
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
New York State Correctional
Defendant:
Ricardo McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Callejas et al
as 2:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Olajuwan Early
Defendant:
Abigail Callejas, Jerome Warfield, Ricardo Moore and others
Mercado-Lozano v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mercado-Lozano and Heriberto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stubbs v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv10129
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs
Defendant:
T. Jackson, A. Crawford and C. LaBreck
Joseph Shine-Johnson, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 23-3861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH T. SHINE-JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RUBIN WILLIAMS, ANTONIO HENDERSON, JARRON EARLEY-TABOR, SR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, AMY ACTON, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH and others
Stubbs #304356 v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs #304356
Defendant:
Michael Brown and Rachael Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Chapa, et al v. Kenton County Judge Executive, et al
as 23-5693
Plaintiff:
GREGORY RICARDO CHAPA
Appellant:
LAWRENCE B. JUTZI
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTON COUNTY JUDGE EXECUTIVE, Individually and Officially, KENTON COUNTY, KY JAILER, Individually and Officially, KENTON COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT BOARD MEMBERS and others
Martin v. Kabia et al
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martin
Defendant:
Nurse Kabia, Nursh Sillah, Jashua Suerdick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Canterbury-Miller et al
as 2:2022cv12921
Plaintiff:
Ricardo G. Cooper
Defendant:
Dianne M. Canterbury-Miller, Chris R. Reed and Gonzales
Benjamin Ragan v. Kelly Wellman
as 22-1857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN RICARDO RAGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY M. WELLMAN, Regional Dietician
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
