Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Little v. Dickson Co. Sheriff's Department
as 3:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Tristan Little
Defendant:
Dickson Co. Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Marion County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Amanda Martin
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Department, Jimmy Clements, Tristan Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv05460
Petitioner:
Shawn Tristan Williams and Shaun T. Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Thorpe et al
as 4:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Ms. Kim, Kevin Lodgson and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hurt et al
as 2:2020cv01120
Defendant:
FNU Sykes, FNU Sharp and FNU Hurt
Plaintiff:
Tristan Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hurt et al
as 1:2020cv01120
Defendant:
FNU Sykes, FNU Sharp and FNU Hurt
Plaintiff:
Tristan Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cretacci v. Hare et al
as 4:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Blake Cretacci
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Cody Duke, Matthew Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Collins et al
as 4:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Defendant:
Tristan Collins, Matthew Hare and Coffee County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCracken et al v. Rowland et al
as 1:2015cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tristan McCracken and Jacob Goethe
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Debra Wagonschutz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
