Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Dwayne Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DAVIS, aka Dwayne Davis-El
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, in their personal capacity, LES PARISH, Warden, in their personal capacity, THOMAS P. MACKIE, Former Warden, in their personal capacity and others
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mourice Neal El v. Showman
as 24-3296
Plaintiff:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF OFFICER MICHAEL SHOWMAN, JR.
Muhammad #242898 v. King et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
El Amin Muhammad #242898
Defendant:
Chris King, J. Winger, Maxwell Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Chambliss v. Joshua Stoddard
as 23-1965
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY CHAMBLISS, aka Corey Chambliss-El
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA STODDARD
El Bey v. Davis et al.
as 3:2023cv02191
Plaintiff:
Steven Abdul-Azziz El Bey
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Paul Engle, Allison Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ali v. United States
as 1:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox El v. Wickersham
as 2:2023cv12427
Petitioner:
Kevin Maddox El
Respondent:
Anthony M. Wickersham
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust et al. v. State of Ohio
as 1:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
Cohen Andre Marquis Trust and Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Titus Willis v. Corizon Healthcare of Michigan, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS C. WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTHCARE OF MICHIGAN, aka Corizon Health, Inc., DUWANE WATERS HOSPITAL, INC., HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
