Cases 91 - 100 of 526
Barrett v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02989
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jan Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Barrett et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
Lisette Leduc, SECRETARY AIR FORCE BARBARA M BARRETT, Joseph Leising and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary P Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Pavement Layers, LLC et al v. The Pavement Group, Inc., et al.
as 1:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Brian Hess, THE PAVEMENT GROUP, INC. and The Pavement Group
Plaintiff:
PROSITEAUDIT, LLC and PAVEMENT LAYERS, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Michael Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrett v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2020cv00937
Petitioner:
Travis J. Barrett
Respondent:
BOP Director Michael Carvajal and Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wortman III v. State of Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 3:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Mark Edward Davidson, f/n/u Stewart, Richard Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Auston Wortman III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Barrett v. Mike Parris
as 20-5202
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME SIDNEY BARRETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PARRIS, Warden
RBD Technologies LLC v. Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
RBD Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Inc. and Barrett Firearms USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gardner v. Barrett Maintenance, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
David Gardner
Defendant:
Barrett Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Splaine v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv00203
Defendant:
David P. King, Colleen F. Arnold, Gregory B. Kenny and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Splaine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARSON v. BARRETT
as 2:2020cv00154
Defendant:
SECRETARY AIR FORCE BARBARA M BARRETT and BARBARA M BARRETT
Plaintiff:
RITA M PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
