Cases 91 - 100 of 708
Garstka v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03214
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Garstka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv11317
Defendant:
W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Alma Garlo, MD, Monica Hill, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong, Kiersten Reeser and L A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Rebekah Atkins v. James Vilt, Jr., et al
as 21-5544
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SWINK, JOANN L. SPICER, EMILY BRAUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Bates v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03014
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JoAnne Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021oe03013
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JoAnne Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03013
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JoAnne Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spinella et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02711
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Spinella and Joann Spinella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cortez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02682
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joann Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey et al v. Dexterous Mold and Tool, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Van Dorn Demag Corporation, Sumitomo (SHI) Demag Plastics Machinery GmbH, Sumitomo (SHI) Demag Plastics Machinery North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Lindsey and Carl Lindsey
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atkins v. Vilt et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Elizabeth Parks, April Dowell, Candace Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
