Cases 91 - 100 of 209
Henderson et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ann Henderson and Walter Davis
Defendant:
Reuben E. Marshall, Swift Transportation , Berreal C. Dorse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saunders v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joshua Saunders
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Shane Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snipes et al v. Tropical Express, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Lynn Snipes and Ronald Snipes
Defendant:
Tropical Express, LLC, Anthony J. Lee, United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 2:2016mc50588
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Davis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Gwenell Davis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , United Parcel Service General Services Co. and BT Property, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc. v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Adam Landers
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc. v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Inter Contiential Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Adam Landers
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
In re: UPS, et al
as 16-101
Petitioner:
In re: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Delaware and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Ohio
Respondent:
GREGORY WINTER
Anderson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Talyon Anderson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Jeff Bloedorn and Ken Harms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
