Cases 101 - 110 of 1,600
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hunter v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John C. Hunter
Defendant:
Pike County, Kentucky, Brian Morris, James Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02878
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail, Chief Rudd, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al
as 2:2022cv13081
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Morris
Defendant:
R. White, King, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morseman v. Helton et al
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Morseman
Defendant:
Brittny Helton, Sergeant Brandon Lampton, Kimberly Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave. et al
as 2:2022cv02848
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave., Floyd Bonner, Lt. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04285
Plaintiff:
Stoney W. Morris
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez-Morris v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04275
Plaintiff:
Maria Ramirez-Morris
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
