Cases 101 - 110 of 114
Stiller et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Stiller and Judith F. Stiller
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 5:2010cv14967
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Williams and Brenda R. Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rukowski v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 1:2010cv02552
Plaintiff:
Richard Rukowski
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ali-Bey v. Mountaineer Title Agency, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv01689
Plaintiff:
Sa Ra R. Ali-Bey
Defendant:
Mountaineer Title Agency, Inc, U.S. Bank N.A., 8997 Chinaberry Circle North, Macedonia, OH 44056 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodney Graves v. Amber Bowles, et al
as 10-5346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY GRAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER BOWLES, ELIZABETH CAPPS, U.S. BANK, N.A. and others
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. et al v. Corley et al
as 3:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Jeremy Corley, John B. Kent and Compass Advisory Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hayes v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv01154
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Home Mortgage Source, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Contour Industries, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 09-6492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONTOUR INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
U.S. BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Leizerman v. U.S Bank N.A., et al.
as 3:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
Erwin J. Leizerman and Erwin J. Leizerman
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bank N.A., U.S. Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
