Cases 111 - 120 of 135
Pate v. Mathes et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Pate
Defendant:
Chris Mathes, Tom Smith, Lt. Fritts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrop v. C.O. Gust et al
as 2:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jon Harrop
Defendant:
C.O. Gust, C.O. Burris and C.O. Kress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Hill v. Rodriguez, et al
as 14-3292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant:
CHIEF RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RUBOSKY, C.O.
Author Turner v. Dan Weikal, et al
as 14-5264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AUTHOR RAY TURNER
Defendant - Appellant:
DAN WEIKAL, Administrator of CJC, K. COX, Director of Operations - Hill Detention Center, PAM HALE, Hill Detention Center Administrator and others
Defendant:
ABL FOOD SERVICES, et al.
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippin v. Carter County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Pippin
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center, Chris Mathis, Lt Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Farrow et al
as 1:2013cv02409
Plaintiff:
Chardon J. Black
Defendant:
Corporal Farrow and C.O. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Stevens v. Michael Grafos, et al
as 13-2422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STEVENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAFOS, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY GUMINSKI, Sgt., aka Unknown Guminiski, VIRG FRANKS, Sgt., STACEY MATTHEWS, C.O. and others
David Brown v. John Prelesnik, et al
as 13-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRELESNIK, Warden, NANNETTE NORWOOD, D.W., ERICA HUSS, D.W. and others
Angel Alonso Galicia v. C.O. Ricks et al
as 2:2013cv02271
Plaintiff:
Angel Alonso Galicia
Defendant:
C.O. Ricks and C.C.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
