Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 209
Siecienski v. Rowe et al
as 1:2014cv01238
Plaintiff: Ignatius Siecienski
Defendant: Eric Trent Rowe and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Miscellaneou: Danny Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00270
Plaintiff: Kevin Bowling and Pam Bowling
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. and Estate of James B. Tacy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01774
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6028
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. United Parcel Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff: Matthew Alan Smith
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Kays v. Jack Coffee, et al
as 14-5530
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY D. KAYS
Defendant - Appellee: JACK COFFEE, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., MIKE FEDERSPEIL and others
Progressive Distribution Services, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00430
Plaintiff: Progressive Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00063
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tiemens v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00912
Plaintiff: Myron F. Tiemens, Jr.
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?