Cases 141 - 150 of 186
Brady et al v. Safeco Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Susan Erika Brady and Nolan Porterfield
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Erika Gentry v. Comm of Social Security
as 13-5719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIKA GENTRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv11640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Farakhan et al v. Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 5:2013cv00428
Defendant:
Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority , James D Casey and Kristy Rider
Plaintiff:
Khadijah R. Farakhan , Yolanda Hayward , Lawanda Moorer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PC Surveillance.net, LLC v. RIKA Group Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
PC Surveillance.net, LLC
Defendant:
RIKA Group Corporation , Ryan L. Temple and Erika A. Temple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Yonker v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 1:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Erika Yonker
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv02550
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Erika Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Brady v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv02175
Plaintiff:
Erika Renee Brady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gentry v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02577
Plaintiff:
Erika Gentry
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
