Cases 141 - 150 of 597
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Tennessee Dept of Correction, et al
as 20-6192
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WALKER, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Commissioner, CRAIG JULLIAN, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Jerome Deering Bey v. J. Terris
as 20-2157
Respondent / Appellee:
J. A. TERRIS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME DEERING BEY
John McMurry v. Michael Brown, et al
as 20-2001
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, MICHAEL BROWN, Warden and MIKE BROWN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY MCMURRY and JOHN HENRY MCMURRY, aka John Henry McMurry-Bey
Jackson v. Prudential Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv02131
Defendant:
Council for Economic Opportunities for Greater Cleveland {CEOGC}, Prudential Insurance Company and Kasan Bey Jackson
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Phillip Boler-Bey v. Lyneal Wainwright
as 20-4011
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP DIONTE BOLER-BEY
Respondent / Appellee:
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden
McClaine-Bey #165012 v. Bury et al
as 2:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lewis Henry McClaine-Bey #165012
Defendant:
Unknown Renard, Unknown Bury, Yubao Li and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 20-5908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN, CHARLES GATEWOOD, Detention Response Team Officer and ROBERT MOORE, Chief Jailer at Shelby County Jail
Clark-Bey v. Boyd
as 3:2020cv00413
Petitioner:
Christopher L Clark-Bey
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lorain Court of Common Pleas et al v. Cohen et al
as 1:2020cv01832
Plaintiff:
Lorain Court of Common Pleas
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael S. Wearsch
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Rabbi Kohan El-Bey Ali
Defendant:
Andre' Marquis Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
