Cases 161 - 170 of 546,644
Vaughn v. 31-W Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02341
Plaintiff:
Danario Vaughn
Defendant:
31-W Insulation Co., Inc. and Connie Williamson
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newcomb et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Ralph Newcomb, Jessica Newcomb, Todd Mathis and others
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and Williamson County School Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Oguejiofor et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 5:2024cv10741
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma Oguejiofor and Chunco Investments
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Eric Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 24-5264
Petitioner:
ERIC KRIEG
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP MCCREARY
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services, Craig Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Bill Lee and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
