Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
LaVigne et al v. ASH NYC Inc.
as 2:2023cv10235
Defendant:
Siren Hospitality, LLC, The Siren Hotel, The Wurlitzer Master Tenant LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alison LaVigne and Michael Cottman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ashe et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 2:2022cv02731
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ashe and Linda Ashe
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I, The Kroger Co. and JFE Franchising, Inc. doing business as Snowfox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adam v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Ash Adam
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Harris County, TX, et al
as 22-3493
Petitioner:
In re: HARRIS COUNTY, TX, ROCKWALL COUNTY, TX, ELLIS COUNTY, TX and others
Not Classified By Court:
NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Respondent:
PLAINTIFFS' EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Ash v. Cadence Bank, N.A.
as 2:2022cv02323
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Sherita Ash
Defendant:
Cadence Bank, N.A. formerly doing business as BANCORPSOUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Streeter Jr. v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2022cv10287
Plaintiff:
Louis Streeter Jr.
Defendant:
Macomb County, Shelby Township, Dylan Najjar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01048
Petitioner:
Michael Ash
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
