Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Green v. Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance et al
as 3:2019cv00566
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Green
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, Walgreens Corp., Better Business Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knapp v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, et al. et al
as 3:2019cv00542
Defendant:
Adrian Bond Harris, Jomy Hernandez, Judith Evelyn Beasley and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Christopher Knapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00596
Defendant:
Sherri Schnipke, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Major Bendross and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briley v. Talbott et al (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00227
Defendant:
Dara Talbott, John Talbott, Deidre Talbott and others
Plaintiff:
Jennings Briley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fountain Leasing, LLC v. Briley et al (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
Fountain Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
Joseph D. Briley, Sr. and Pea Creek Mine, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
John Doe v. Beverly Briley, et al
as 16-6823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN N. DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY BRILEY, HUGH MOTT, SAM L. FELTS, JR. and others
USA v. David Briley
as 16-1707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BRILEY
Briley v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00916
Plaintiff:
Connie Briley
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe v. Beverly Briley, et al
as 14-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN N. DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY BRILEY, HUGH MOTT, SAM L. FELTS, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
