Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Lewis v. Carty et al
as 3:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Lewis
Defendant:
Carolyn Carty, Margarett Fishback Powers and Basil Zangere
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Carty v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv01186
Plaintiff:
Gary Carty
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Eastman Chemical Company Welfare Benefit Program and Eastman Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pinion v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 7:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tina Pinion
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Travis Carty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mate v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00747
Plaintiff:
Winner Dawan Mate
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Cynthia B. Mausser, Jamie Gentene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carty v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Carty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Telerent Leasing Corporation v. Progressive Medical Imaging & Minimally Invasive Theraputics, PLC et al
as 1:2011cv15476
Plaintiff:
Telerent Leasing Corporation
Defendant:
Progressive Medical Imaging & Minimally Invasive Theraputics, PLC, Gerard Farrar , Charles Guidot and others
Cross_claimant:
Harold Blumenstein , Gerard Farrar , Richard Jankowski and others
Cross_defendant:
Progressive Medical Imaging & Minimally Invasive Theraputics, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelvin Reed v. Kimberly Carty, et al
as 09-5345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN W. REED
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY CARTY, Louisville Metro Police Department, CHADRICK CRICK, Louisville Metro Police Department, ROBERT WHITE, Louisville Metro Police Department and others
Reed v. Carty et al
as 3:2007cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kelvin W. Reed
Defendant:
Kimberly Carty, Chadrick Crick, Robert White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
