Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Malee v. Anthony & Frank DiTomaso, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00490
Plaintiff:
Chanel Malee
Defendant:
Anthony & Frank DiTomaso, Inc. , Anthony DiTomaso and Fred DiTomaso
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Chanel, Inc. v. Pride Booker
as 1:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Shakira Pride Booker and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Merrill et al v. Greektown Casino, L.L.C.
as 2:2014cv11489
Defendant:
GREEKTOWN CASINO, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Merrill , Cesaree Wash-Hayes , Nicholas Cedeno and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Dominque Allen v. City of Benton Harbor, et al
as 14-1036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINQUE CHANEL ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR and ESTATE OF JARED LORENZO GRAVES
Chanel, Inc. et al v. Wrice et al
as 5:2013cv00891
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc. and Tiffany (NJ), LLC
Defendant:
Jermaine Wrice, Apparel Empire, LLC and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. Allure Boutique, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10428
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Allure Boutique, Inc., Abraham Hejazi and Does 1-10
v. Allure Boutique, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10394
Defendant:
Allure Boutique, Inc., Abraham Hejazi and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Preston v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Chanell Preston
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wall et al v. Cytosport et al
as 3:2012cv00561
Plaintiff:
Chanell Wall and Marquise Steven Wall
Defendant:
Cytosport, Inc, GAT and City of Gatlinburg, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
