Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Knapp v. KenAmerican Resources, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00064
Defendant:
Murray Energy Corporation, KenAmerican Resources, Inc. and Fricke Management & Contracting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dena Marie Knapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rebekah Atkins v. James Vilt, Jr., et al
as 21-5544
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SWINK, JOANN L. SPICER, EMILY BRAUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Atkins v. Vilt et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Elizabeth Parks, April Dowell, Candace Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Cincinnati Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Fath Properties, Citizen Complaint Authority, Cincinnati Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doss v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv06409
Plaintiff:
Dena Doss
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitehair v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2020cv00917
Respondent:
Ruth Woods, Tennessee, State of and Dena Davis
Petitioner:
Matthew Whitehair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peak v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05403
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dena Peak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00376
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dena Loper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Joseph Ciccio, et al v. SmileDirectClub, LLC, et al
as 20-5833
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANA JOHNSON, DR. VISHU RAJ, DR. ARTHUR KAPIT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
