Cases 11 - 20 of 239
City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement System v. Holley Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Defendant:
Holley Inc., Empower Ltd., Tom Tomlinson and others
Plaintiff:
City of Fort Lauderdale General Employees' Retirement System
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville et al
as 5:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Forte et al
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville and Christian County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, The Hopkinsville Police Dept and B. ODonnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forte v. City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky and Hopkinsville Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fort v. Layson
as 3:2023cv01963
Plaintiff:
Shawnathan Delrea Fort
Defendant:
Erica Layson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West Stone Works Co., Inc. v. Fort Worth Monument, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
West Stone Works Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Fort Worth Monument, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Fort v. Layson
as 2:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Shawnathan Delrea Fort
Defendant:
Erica Layson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Fort v. Motuza
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Shawnathan Delnea Fort
Defendant:
Jenna Lee Motuza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fort v. Motuza
as 1:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Shawnathan Delrea Fort
Defendant:
Jenna Lee Motuza
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
