Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Harness v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Erman L Harness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton et al v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2019cv00441
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and Anderson County, TN
Plaintiff:
Erman L Harness, Devin D Brown, James D Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harness v. Anderson County, Tennessee
as 3:2019cv00340
Plaintiff:
Gail Harness
Defendant:
Anderson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Harness, et al v. Jonathan Taft, et al
as 19-5484
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN P. TAFT and RAYMOND E. TOWNSEND
Plaintiff:
KARI MARCUM HARNESS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH E. HARNESS
Harness et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 3:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Brandon Harness and Deanna Harness
Defendant:
Optimus Enterprise, Inc., Walmart, Inc. and Overseas Connection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harness v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Gail Harness
Defendant:
William T. Jones and Anderson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harness v. USA
as 1:2017cv00187
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lonnie Harness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mynatt v. National Treasury Employees Union Chapter 39 et al
as 3:2017cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Mynatt
Defendant:
National Treasury Employees Union Chapter 39 , John E. Van Atta , National Treasury Employee Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnessed Motion LLC v. Kuroda Jena Tec Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv12255
Plaintiff:
Harnessed Motion LLC
Defendant:
Kuroda Jena Tec Incorporated and Jena-Tec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Whiteside v. Hickman County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Cedrick Whiteside
Defendant:
Hickman County, Tennessee , Lorye Harness and Dawnise Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
