Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Waddle v. Commissionor Tenn. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01309
Plaintiff:
Bobby Waddle
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1-2, John Doe 1-7, The Outside Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Wilbon v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS ANTHONY WILBON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL KLEE, JOHN DOE, 1-5 and others
Jones v. City of Franklin, Tennessee et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee, Williamson Medical Center, John Does 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martha J. Klopfenstein v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
Martha J. Klopfenstein
Defendant:
Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. , Sunrise of Rocky River and Jane Does 1&2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fisher v. Secoy et al
as 2:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
John Fisher
Defendant:
Randy Secoy, Jimmy Joe Childs, John #1-#2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyttenbach v. Parish et al
as 3:2012cv00386
Petitioner:
William Hayes Wyttenbach
Appellee:
Ranita Marie Parish
Respondent:
Texas Supreme Court, Court of Appeals 13th District of Texas, Banales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
William Wyttenbach v. Utah Supreme Court, et al
as 12-5406
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM HAYES WYTTENBACH
Respondent - Appellee:
UTAH SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS OF UTAH, JAMES SHUMATE, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
