Cases 11 - 20 of 89
In re: Subpoena to Perkins Coie LLP, in the matter of Steve Snyder-Hill, et al. v. The Ohio State University (S.D. Ohio 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD)
as 2:2019mc00038
In Re:
Perkins Coie LLP
Petitioner:
The Ohio State University
Interested Party:
Kurt Huntsinger, David Mulvin, William Rieffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stark v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2019cv02396
Defendant:
MPD Officer Ervin, MPD Sgt. Daniel Cordero, MPD Deputy Chief Don Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Diane Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Floyd v. Bonner et al
as 2:2019cv02385
Defendant:
Regional One Medical Center, Floyd Bonner, CCS Medical and others
Plaintiff:
James Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe 1-2 Individuals and John Doe 3-6 Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00404
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe 1-2 Individuals and John Doe 3-6 Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crowe v. Pounders et al
as 2:2018cv02885
Defendant:
AWO Jones, Nurse Practitioners (2), Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pyrett v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv02330
Plaintiff:
Roberta Pyrett
Defendant:
John Doe #1-2, WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston v. Maria et al
as 2:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Rico I. Hairston
Defendant:
Maria, Brown, Grimm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
