Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Scott v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10322
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, John Doe Officer I and John Does 2-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettway v. Michigan State Police et al
as 2:2021cv12716
Plaintiff:
Devin Monair-Donth Pettway
Defendant:
Michigan State Police, Trooper Brennan Kelly and John Doe Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillis v. City of Kingsport TN et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Gillis
Defendant:
City of Kingsport TN, Joseph Malone, Nickolaus Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kwart v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2021cv10826
Defendant:
John Doe Officer 3, John Doe Officer 2, City of Detroit and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kwart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2020cv12370
Plaintiff:
Paul Moore
Defendant:
Oakland County and John Doe Officers 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Reyes et al
as 2:2020cv10290
Defendant:
John Doe Officers and Michael Reyes
Plaintiff:
Clinton Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv12490
Defendant:
Sergeant Johnson, John Doe Officer 2, John Doe Officer 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutt v. Seta et al
as 1:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Barge, P.O. Paul Vollner, P.O. Christopher Seta and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett Filous v. Chad Schell, et al
as 19-3485
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER CHAD SCHELL, individually and official capacity, OFFICER SCOTT PHILLIPS and JOHN DOE, Officers 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRETT FILOUS
Baker v. Carnine et al
as 1:2019cv00060
Defendant:
David McLlwain, John Doe Officers, Jeffrey Carnine and others
Plaintiff:
David Adam Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
