Cases 11 - 20 of 36
USA v. Melvin Harris
as 20-2203
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN JAMES HARRIS, aka Malvin James Harris
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02353
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Burke v. Erwin et al
as 5:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Amy Fisher, DeEdra Hart, Will Lynn and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenner et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11661
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrei Fenner, Joshua Herman, Anthony Gadecki and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carrie Mizell, Matt Henderson, George Stanley and others
Petitioner:
Trifecta Performance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Bordages, Jr. v. DOJ, et al
as 15-6349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HARRY HEBERT BORDAGES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS' OFFICE and others
Bordages v. United States Justice Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02708
Plaintiff:
James Harry Hebert Bordages, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Justice Dept., United States Dept. of Homeland Security, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottie Pennington v. Bob Terry, et al
as 15-5314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTIE DALE PENNINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB TERRY, DAVID DUKES, KEN SIRCY and others
Windland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02445
Plaintiff:
James Harry Windland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. George
as 1:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Enoch George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
