Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Keeling v. LeMaster
as 0:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Eric Scott Keeling
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keeling v. Grayson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keeling
Defendant:
Grayson County Detention Center, Jason Woosley and Kyle Tarrance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeling v. Garnett Hospitality et al
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keeling
Defendant:
Garnett Hospitality, Commonwealth Hotels, Allianz Global and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper-Keel v. State of Michigan et al
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Nevin P. Cooper-Keel
Defendant:
State of Michigan and Roberts Kengis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cooper-Keel v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Nevin P. Cooper-Keel
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Roberts Kengis and Margaret Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05055
Plaintiff:
Melissa D Keel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keeling v. Hartman et al
as 5:2021cv00057
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Matt Carter and Jeffery Hartman
Plaintiff:
Shelley E. Keeling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper-Keel v. Allegan County, et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Aimee Kamphuis, Margaret Baker, Jennifer Kamps and others
Plaintiff:
Nevin P. Cooper-Keel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fleming v. Foley et al
as 1:2020cv00916
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fleming
Defendant:
Attorney Michael Trapp, Judge Patrick J. Foley, Prosecutor James keeling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Brannon Crossing Family Dental, PLLC
as 5:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Brannon Crossing Family Dental, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Madeline Keeling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
