Cases 11 - 20 of 611
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Warner, Norcross & JuddIn re: Warner, Norcross & Judd
as 23-108
Petitioner:
In re: WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD
Respondent:
MICHAEL KINGEN and KELLEY RAMSEY
Sullivan v. O'Malley et al.
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Donald Sullivan
Defendant:
Michael C. O'Malley, Judge Deborah M. Turner, Judge Wanda C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Brenda M. Kelley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gardner v. Kelley Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gardner
Defendant:
Kelley Trucking, LLC and Corey M. Callaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Dykes-Bey v. Cecil et al
as 1:2023cv11998
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes-Bey
Defendant:
Emily Cecil, Kelley Wellman, Mary Velarde and others
Minton v. Adams County Common Pleas Court et al
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Kelly Minton
Defendant:
Adams County Common Pleas Court doing business as David Kelley [In Privite and Personal Capacity] and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. City of Fairview Park et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Ted Bowman
Defendant:
City of Fairview Park, City of North Olmsted, Matthew Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
