Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Randall v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00893
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark S Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mike Kowall, et al v. Jocelyn Benson
as 21-1129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY VALENTINE, ROGER KAHN, CLARK HARDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of State
Anthony Viola v. Mark Bennett
as 21-3014
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK S. BENNETT, U.S. Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hudnell et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2020cv01220
Defendant:
Richard S Fambro, David G Schilling, Mayor Frank G Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hudnell, Mark S Ondrejech and Mark S. Ondrejech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthur Moler v. Benjamin Potter, et al
as 20-5579
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] PROPERTY GUARDS, Property Officers, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through the BOP Ian Connors, Central Office Counsel for the BOP, CARLOS MARTINEZ, Deputy Counsel Mid-Atlantic Regional Office "MARO" and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR FLEMMING MOLER
Knight v. Nugent et al
as 1:2020cv00682
Defendant:
Donald C. Nugent and Mark S. Bennett
Plaintiff:
Delores L. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 2:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Mark S. Beer
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Nagel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Viola v. Mark Bennett
as 19-4170
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK S. BENNETT, U.S. Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. VIOLA
Leese v. Village of Union City Ohio et al
as 3:2019cv00358
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leon Leese
Defendant:
Village of Union City Ohio, John Doe, I-IX, Union City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
