Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Burnett v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Carmie Ronata Burnett
Defendant:
Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department, Eric Winstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Koplin B & W LLC v. Middleton Reutlinger P.S.C.
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Koplin B & W LLC
Defendant:
Middleton Reutlinger P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Middleton v. Commonwealth Public Advocacy's Office
as 5:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brenda Middleton
Defendant:
Commonwealth Public Advocacy's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. State of Kentucky
as 5:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brenda Middleton
Defendant:
State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wake Plumbing LLC v. Wake Painting LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Wake Plumbing LLC
Defendant:
Wake Painting LLC, Ashley Wake and Randy Middleton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Middleton v. John Gilley
as 22-5416
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL PRESTON MIDDLETON
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
Davis v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Will Davis
Defendant:
Grand Rapids, City of, Grand Rapids Police Department, Douglas Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
