Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Lindsay v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 2:2020cv00040
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff:
Fabian D. Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Harvest Investments, LLC et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 2:2020cv10078
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company and Harvest Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
as 1:2019cv02311
Plaintiff:
Marqueth Wilson
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Co. and Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sherwin-Williams Company v. Sapient Corporation
as 1:2019cv01610
Defendant:
Sapient Corporation fka Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC dba Sapientrazorfish, Sapient Corporation, Sapient Corporation formerly known as Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC doing business as Sapientrazorfish and others
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Company, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Company, Inc. (TV3)
as 4:2019cv00032
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 1:2019cv00337
Plaintiff:
Marqueth Wilson
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherwin-Williams Company v. Nicholson
as 1:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Michael Fullerton and Steven C. Nicholson
Plaintiff:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725
Marqueth Wilson v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 19-3050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUETH WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
