Cases 21 - 30 of 14,046
Abney v. Auto One Glass and Accessories et al
as 2:2024cv12286
Defendant:
Mark McFadden, John Doe and Auto One Glass and Accessories
Plaintiff:
Devon Terrell Abney
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reeder v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv12276
Plaintiff:
Zachary Paul Reeder
Defendant:
John Doe, Diana Harris and Villarreal
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whitfield v. Runyan et al.
as 3:2024cv01497
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Flinn v. Portage County, Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv01492
Defendant:
Bryan Morgenstern, Maddison Knapp, Josh Orwick and others
Plaintiff:
Kieve Flinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv01055
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.140.112.250
as 3:2024cv01056
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.140.112.250
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Defendant:
DRC- Director Anette Chambers-Smith, Captain James Harris, Medical Staff Jane Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Jeronica Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00492
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
