Cases 21 - 30 of 5,196
Davis v. Michigan, State of
as 2:2024cv11257
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Davis
Respondent:
Michigan, State of
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Bonn et al
as 5:2024cv11253
Defendant:
Javal, Herell, John Bonn and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
USA v. Antonio Davis
as 24-3406
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTONIO MAURICE DAVIS, aka Anthony Maurice Davis
Poole v. Marco et al.
as 1:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Joyce Poole
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Marco, Richard Marco, John Oberholtzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Borojevic et al
as 2:2024cv11247
Plaintiff:
Caleb Davis
Defendant:
Dario Borojevic, JIT Road Transportation and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cain et al v. Lincoln Financial Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Diane Cain and Diane L. Davis-Cain
Defendant:
Lincoln Financial Insurance Agency Inc., Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation and Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Davis v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65462
Plaintiff:
Kyle T Davis
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Titus v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Warden Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Ralph Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
