Cases 21 - 30 of 225
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ms. Christine Smith and Christine Smith
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kelly v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rose Kelly
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Strassburg v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Wade Strassburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Houston v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Houston
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. Saul
as 5:2021cv10451
Plaintiff:
Chirece Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McCarty v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Timothy David McCarty
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holland v. Saul
as 2:2021cv10364
Plaintiff:
Renee Holland
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mason v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amy Mason o.b.o. J.M., a Minor and Amy Mason
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yager v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Beverly J Yager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lara o.b.o. A.L., a Minor v. Saul
as 4:2021cv10274
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lara o.b.o. A.L., a Minor
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
