Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Johnnie Clanton, Jr. v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 3:2014cv00077
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company and Brian K Crowell
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Clanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worthington et al v. DIMA S.L. et al
as 3:2013cv00651
Plaintiff:
Lori Worthington , Kimberly Conrad , Leona Roberts and others
Defendant:
DIMA S.L., Neomedic International, S.L., Neomedic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dart Machinery, Limited v. Procomp Electronics, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2010cv11761
Plaintiff:
Dart Machinery, Limited
Defendant:
Procomp Electronics, Inc. and Procomp Motorsports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Wright v. Dart Transit et al
as 2:2009cv02673
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Dart Transit, Evans Delivery and Temple of Deliverence Church of God and Christ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dart Machinery, Ltd. v. Procomp Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
Dart Machinery, Ltd. and Dart Machinery, Ltd.
Defendant:
Procomp Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Harrison v. Dart Bank
as 5:2009cv12688
Plaintiff:
Ray M Harrison
Defendant:
Dart Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type:
Other Statutes
RaceRedi Motorsports, LLC v. Dart Machinery, Ltd.
as 2:2008cv14418
Plaintiff:
RaceRedi Motorsports, LLC
Defendant:
Dart Machinery, Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
